As commented in Perspective

I agree with The Voice in part. No one person has reached the capabilities to weild the three edged sword. It takes a lot of training and patience just to accept the concept. Understanding how to understand is not something we as humans are evolved enough to do yet. I just don't agree that the two persons involved in a disagreement are both wrong. Mistaken because they cannot grasp and understand the other person, but that is a shortcoming that we share as a species. So how can I deem anyone WRONG for being human? That would be a fallicy of the whole statement if both were wrong, that would conversely mean noone was right.Which mean that any disagreement can never be resolved, and that everything in this world is comprimise. That is sad and depressing, that would mean we live in a world devoid of understanding. Society has always lacked it on grand scales, hence alot of the sins of the past. But we as strong-minded and intelligent individuals should strive for understanding, of ourselves, of one another. That is all, just that one question. Please give me this guidance, for I seek all of your council on this matter.